ERIC DUNGAN V. RON BARNES, No. 11-17992 (9th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 06 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ERIC KENNETH DUNGAN, Petitioner - Appellant, No. 11-17992 D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01191-DAD v. MEMORANDUM * RON BARNES, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Submitted October 25, 2012 ** Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. California state prisoner Eric Kenneth Dungan appeals pro se from the district court s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Dungan contends that insufficient evidence was presented at trial to support his conviction for second degree murder. We agree with the district court that the state court s determination that sufficient evidence supported Dungan s conviction was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 318-19 (1979), or based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the state court record. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) & (2); see Harrington v. Richter, 131 S. Ct. 770, 785 (2011); Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1275 n.13 (9th Cir. 2005).1 AFFIRMED. 1 granted. Dungan s May 4, 2102, unopposed motion to supplement the record is

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.