USA V. FERNANDO DELGADO-ORNELAS, No. 11-10138 (9th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEB 14 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 11-10138 D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00707-DCB v. MEMORANDUM * FERNANDO DELGADO-ORNELAS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David S. Doty, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted February 11, 2013 *** Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. Fernando Delgado-Ornelas appeals from the district court s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for reentry after * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Delgado-Ornelas s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Delgado-Ornelas has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed. Delgado-Ornelas has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly grant the government s motion to dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988. Counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Delgado-Ornelas s motion for leave to file a request for an extension of time and request for extension of time are denied as moot, as Delgado-Ornelas s pro se brief was received and filed within the time granted by the court. DISMISSED. 2 11-10138

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.