NEHEMIAH ROBINSON V. T. CATLETT, No. 10-56885 (9th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED FEB 29 2012 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NEHEMIAH ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 10-56885 D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00161-H-BLM v. MEMORANDUM * T. CATLETT, Sergeant; et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 21, 2012 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, AND BYBEE, Circuit Judges. California state prisoner Nehemiah Robinson appeals pro se from the district court s order denying his motion for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants delayed assigning him to a lower bunk, confiscated his * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). cane, denied him pain medication, and retaliated against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Nunes v. Ashcroft, 375 F.3d 805, 807 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Robinson s post-judgment motion because Robinson failed to show any newly discovered evidence, intervening change in controlling law, clear error, or manifest injustice. See id. at 807-08 (setting forth grounds justifying reconsideration). Robinson s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. AFFIRMED. 2 10-56885
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
