United States v. Carpenter, No. 10-30146 (9th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseDefendant was convicted of five counts relating to child pornography and subsequently appealed his convictions. The court held that the district court did not err in denying defendant's untimely motion to proceed pro se and, moreover, defendant failed to make an unequivocal request to proceed pro se. The court also held that the district court did not err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss as barred by the statute of limitations the first two counts against him where the district court applied 18 U.S.C. 3283's extended statute of limitations. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.