United States v. Lafley, No. 10-30132 (9th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseDefendant pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine. At issue was whether defendant was entitled, under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. 2000bb-2000bb-4, to use marijuana during his period of supervised release. The court held that because the government's interest in prohibiting a convicted methamphetamine dealer from using controlled substances during supervised release was compelling and because Standard Condition Number 7 was the least restrictive means of advancing that interest, the district court correctly imposed the condition.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.