USA v. Randy Jangula, No. 10-30044 (9th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED JAN 04 2011 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, Nos. 10-30044 & 10-30045 D.C. Nos. 4:02-cr-00048-SEH 4:03-cr-00038-SEH v. RANDY JAMES JANGULA, MEMORANDUM * Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 14, 2010 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges. In these consolidated cases, Randy James Jangula appeals from the 24month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jangula contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances, the district court s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, the district court did not procedurally err. See id. AFFIRMED. 2 10-30044 & 10-30045

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.