THE SAVE THE PEAKS COALTION V. USFS, No. 10-17896 (9th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on February 9, 2012.

Download PDF

Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã®Ã¨ Ã®Ã°Ã¯Ã® Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã²Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã¥ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã¥ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã¥ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã¥ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã¥ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã¥ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã¥ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã¥ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã¥ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã ´¿·²¬·ºº- Ã³ Ã °°»´´¿²¬-Ã´ Ã ±Ã² Ã¯Ã°Ã³Ã¯Ã©Ã¨Ã§Ãª Ã Ã²Ã Ã² Ã ±Ã² ÃÃ¦Ã°Ã§Ã³½ªÃ³Ã°Ã¨Ã¯ÃªÃÃ³Ã Ã Ã Ã ·-¬®·½¬ ±º Ã ®·¦±²¿Ã´ Ã ¸±»²·¨ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã ªÃ² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã¥ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã ½¬·²¹ Ã ±®»-¬ Ã «°»®ª·-±® º±® ¬¸» Ã ±½±²·²± Ã ¿¬·±²¿´ Ã ±®»-¬Ã´ Ã »º»²¼¿²¬- Ã³ Ã °°»´´»»-Ã´ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã ²¬»®ª»²±®Ã³Ã »º»²¼¿²¬ Ã³ Ã °°»´´»»Ã² Ã »º±®»Ã¦ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ ¿²¼ Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã ·®½«·¬ Ã «¼¹»-Ã² Ã «® ±®¼»® º·´»¼ ±² Ã «²» Ã®Ã¯Ã´ Ã®Ã°Ã¯Ã® Ã¸Ã Ã Ã Ã ±Ã² Ã©Ã©Ã· ·- ¸»®»¾§ ¿³»²¼»¼Ã² Ã ´´ °±®¬·±²- ±º ¬¸» ±®¼»®Ã´ »¨½»°¬ ¬¸» °±®¬·±² ¼»²§·²¹ Ã ²¬»®ª»²±®Ã³Ã »º»²¼¿²¬Ã³Ã °°»´´»» Ã ®·¦±²¿ Ã ²±©¾±©´ Ã »-±®¬ Ã ·³·¬»¼ Ã ¿®¬²»®-¸·°Å½- Ã¸Ã ²±©¾±©´Ã· ³±¬·±² º±® ¿¬¬±®²»§Å½- º»»-Ã´ ¿®» ©·¬¸¼®¿©²Ã´ Ã ²±©¾±©´Å½- ³±¬·±² º±® ½±-¬- ·- ¼»²·»¼Ã´ ¿²¼ ±«® ®»º»®®¿´ ±º ¬¸» ±®¼»® ¬± ¬¸» Ã °°»´´¿¬» Ã ±³³·--·±²»® ·- ©·¬¸¼®¿©²Ã² Ã ² ´·¹¸¬ ±º ¬¸»-» ¿³»²¼³»²¬-Ã´ Ã ¬¬±®²»§ Ã ´¿·²¬·ºº-Å½Ã±Ã °°»´´¿²¬- Ã ¿ª» ¬¸» Ã »¿µÃ ±¿´·¬·±²Å½- Ã «´§ Ã«Ã´ Ã®Ã°Ã¯Ã® Ã »¬·¬·±² º±® Ã »¸»¿®·²¹ Ã ² Ã ¿²½ ·- ¼»²·»¼Ã´ ¿- ³±±¬Ã² Ã® Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã®Ã¨ Ã®Ã°Ã¯Ã® Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã²Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã ±Ã²Ã¯Ã°Ã³Ã¯Ã©Ã¨Ã§Ãª Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã ·®½«·¬ Ã «¼¹»Ã´ ¼·--»²¬·²¹Ã¦ Ã ®»-°»½¬º«´´§ ¼·--»²¬Ã² Ã ©±«´¼ ·³°±-» -¿²½¬·±²- ±² Ã ¸¿²µ»® º±® ¢¹®±--´§ ¿¾«-Ã ·²¹Ã ¬¸» ¶«¼·½·¿´ °®±½»-- ¾§ -¬®¿¬»¹·½¿´´§ ¸±´¼·²¹ ¾¿½µ ½´¿·³- ¬¸¿¬ ½±«´¼ ¸¿ª»Ã´ ¿²¼ -¸±«´¼ ¸¿ª»Ã´ ¾»»² ¿--»®¬»¼ ·² ¬¸» º·®-¬ ´¿©-«·¬ Ã¸¿²¼ ©±«´¼ ¸¿ª» ¾»»² ¼»½·¼»¼ »¿®´·»® ¾«¬ º±® ½±«²-»´Å½- °®±½»¼«®¿´ »®®±®- ·² ®¿·-·²¹ ¬¸±-» ½´¿·³-Ã·Ã²Å Ã ¿ª» ¬¸» Ã »¿µ- Ã ±¿´Ã² ªÃ² Ã Ã²Ã Ã² Ã ±®»-¬ Ã »®ªÃ²Ã´ ÃªÃªÃ§ Ã Ã²Ã¼ Ã¯Ã°Ã®Ã«Ã´ Ã¯Ã°Ã®Ã¨ Ã¸Ã§¬¸ Ã ·®Ã² Ã®Ã°Ã¯Ã®Ã·Ã²

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.