Bruce Eklund v. City of Seattle Municiple Cour, et al, No. 09-35652 (9th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 24 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRUCE EKLUND, an individual, No. 09-35652 Plaintiff-counter-claimdefendant - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:06-cv-01815-TSZ MEMORANDUM * v. CITY OF SEATTLE MUNICIPAL COURT, a municipal corporation, Defendant-counter-claimantplaintiff - Appellee, FRED BONNER; JANE DOE BONNER; GAYLE TAJIMA; JOHN DOE TAJIMA, and their marital community; YOLANDE WILLIAMS; JOHN DOE WILLIAMS, and their marital community; MARK PARCHER; JANE DOE PARCHER, and their marital community, Defendants - Appellees. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted August 6, 2010 Seattle, Washington Before: CANBY, NOONAN and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Bruce Eklund appeals from the district court s order granting immunity and awarding attorneys fees and statutory penalties to defendants Gayle Tajima, Mark Parcher, and Yolande Williams pursuant to Washington s anti-SLAPP statute, Wash. Rev. Code ยง 4.25.510. We review the district court s statutory interpretation de novo and the fee award for abuse of discretion. Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Hoen, 538 F.3d 1128, 1132 (9th Cir. 2008); Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Winter, 543 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir. 2008). In a decision issued after the district court s order in this case, the Washington Supreme Court found that the Washington anti-SLAPP statute grants immunity only to a non-government individual or organization. Segaline v. State Dep t of Labor & Indus., No. 81931-9, 2010 WL 3259872, at *3 n.4 (Wash. Aug. 19, 2010) (adopting the Washington Court of Appeals holding in Skimming v. Boxer, 119 Wash. App. 748, 758 (2004)). As employees of the Seattle Municipal Court, Tajima, Parcher, and Williams are not immune from the claims against 2 them. The award of attorneys fees and statutory penalties based on defendants success in their anti-SLAPP defense is accordingly vacated. REVERSED and REMANDED. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.