XIU JIN V. ERIC H. HOLDER JR., No. 08-74758 (9th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APR 24 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 08-74758 XIU CHAI JIN, Agency No. A071-568-382 Petitioner, v. MEMORANDUM* ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted April 19, 2013** San Francisco, California Before: NOONAN, O SCANNLAIN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Xiu Chai Jin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the BIA s decision denying her second motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We dismiss in part and deny in part her petition for review. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The BIA has broad discretion to grant or deny motions to reopen immigration proceedings. INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323 (1992). Here, the BIA did not abuse its discretion when it determined that Jin failed to show reasonable cause for missing her exclusion hearing in 1993 and for delaying thirteen years before filing her first motion to reopen. Likewise, the BIA did not abuse its discretion when it found that Jin failed to show changed circumstances in China sufficient to justify reopening immigration proceedings. We lack jurisdiction to review Jin s claim to the extent she challenges the BIA s refusal to exercise its sua sponte discretion to reopen. Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002); see also Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder, 633 F.3d 818, 823 24 (9th Cir. 2011) (reaffirming Ekimian). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.