Nicolas Perez v. Eric H. Holder Jr., No. 08-74215 (9th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED JAN 25 2011 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NICOLAS PEREZ, No. 08-74215 Petitioner, Agency No. A075-262-309 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted January 10, 2011 ** Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Nicolas Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. ยง 1252. We review for substantial evidence * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the agency s continuous physical presence determination, Lopez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 847, 851 (9th Cir. 2004), and we deny the petition for review. The record does not compel the conclusion that Perez met his burden of establishing continuous physical presence where he failed to provide sufficient evidence supporting his presence from September 1987. See Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir. 1999) (evidence does not compel a conclusion contrary to the agency s where there is [t]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence ) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 08-74215

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.