PEGGY O'NEAL-GONZALES V. CITY OF INGLEWOOD, No. 08-57039 (9th Cir. 2012)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PEGGY O'NEAL GONZALES; TRAYVON GUY; DANIEL P. BELL; SHANITA LASHAUN ALLEN BELL; LATOYA TIMMONS; CRYSTAL McGEE; CESAR SIS, No. 08-57039 D.C. No. 2:06-cv-00178-GAF-CT MEMORANDUM * Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF INGLEWOOD; RONALD C. BANKS; DETECTIVE BRIAN BRUCE; DETECTIVE JAVIER ALCALA; SERGEANT HECTOR RAMIREZ; DETECTIVE JOSEPH CUPO; DETECTIVE CHRIS WUNNO; DETECTIVE JOSE GONZALES; LOS ANGELES COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT; DEBBIE A. NELSON; OFFICER JOE VELASQUEZ; SPECIAL AGENT RONALD REED; SUE DUTCHER, Defendants - Appellees. PEGGY O'NEAL GONZALES; TRAYVON GUY; DANIEL P. BELL; SHANITA LASHAUN ALLEN BELL; * No. 09-55785 D.C. No. 2:06-cv-00178-GAF-CT This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. LATOYA TIMMONS; CRYSTAL McGEE; CESAR SIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF INGLEWOOD; RONALD C. BANKS; DETECTIVE BRIAN BRUCE; DETECTIVE JAVIER ALCALA; SERGEANT HECTOR RAMIREZ; DETECTIVE JOSEPH CUPO; DETECTIVE CHRIS WUNNO; DETECTIVE JOSE GONZALES; LOS ANGELES COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT; DEBBIE A. NELSON; OFFICER JOE VELASQUEZ; SPECIAL AGENT RONALD REED; SUE DUTCHER, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 12, 2012 ** Pasadena, California Before: SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 District Judge.*** We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its well-reasoned orders. AFFIRMED. *** The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.