USA v. Ramon Medina-Cota, No. 08-10333 (9th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED JAN 20 2011 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 08-10333 & 08-10334 D.C. Nos. 4:01-cr-01796-RCC 4:06-cr-01718-RCC v. MEMORANDUM * RAMON LORENZO MEDINA-COTA, a.k.a. Ramon Medina-Cota, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 10, 2011 ** Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. In these consolidated appeals, Ramon Lorenzo Medina-Cota appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 75-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and from his revocation of supervised * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). release and 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Medina-Cota s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a supplemental brief. No pro se brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, the district court s judgments are AFFIRMED. 2 08-10333 & 08-10334

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.