LEMUS-EVERADO V. ERIC HOLDER, JR., No. 07-74119 (9th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JESUS LEMUS-EVERADO, a.k.a. Everado De Jesus Lemus, No. 07-74119 Agency No. A035-342-313 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted October 9, 2013 Pasadena, California Before: PAEZ and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSON, Chief District Judge.** Jesus Lemus-Everado petitions for review of a final order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), affirming the denial by an immigration * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, Chief District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota, sitting by designation. judge (IJ) of Lemus s application for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction to review the BIA s decision pursuant to 8 U.S.C. ยง 1252. The BIA s decision that Lemus had not established that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if removed to Guatemala was supported by substantial evidence. Both the BIA and the IJ carefully considered the evidence presented by Lemus, including the testimony of an expert witness, and found it unpersuasive. The BIA thus properly determined that Lemus had not made the showing necessary to obtain CAT relief. DENIED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.