Flores, et al v. Horne, et al, No. 07-15603 (9th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MIRIAM FLORES, individually and as a parent of Miriam Flores, minor child; ROSA RZESLAWSKI, individually and as a parent of Mario Rzeslawski, minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and SPEAKER OF THE ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND PRESIDENT OF THE ARIZONA SENATE, Intervenor, v. STATE OF ARIZONA, Defendant-Appellee, THOMAS C. HORNE, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Defendant-Appellant, and C. DIANE BISHOP, Superintendent of Public Instruction; EUGENE HUGHES; DAVID SILVA; CLAUDINE BATES ARTHUR; JOHN HOSNER; KEN BENNETT; RAY KELLIS; JIM ALLMAN; MORRISON WARREN, members of the State Board of Education, Defendants. 10919    No. 07-15603 D.C. No. CV-92-00596-RCC District of Arizona, Tucson 10920 FLORES v. HORNE MIRIAM FLORES, individually and as a parent of Miriam Flores, minor child; ROSA RZESLAWSKI, individually and as a parent of Mario Rzeslawski, minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellees, SPEAKER OF THE ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND PRESIDENT OF THE ARIZONA SENATE, Intervenor-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA; C. DIANE BISHOP, Superintendent of Public Instruction; EUGENE HUGHES; DAVID SILVA; CLAUDINE BATES ARTHUR; JOHN HOSNER; KEN BENNETT; RAY KELLIS; JIM ALLMAN; MORRISON WARREN, members of the State Board of Education; THOMAS C. HORNE, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Defendants.   No. 07-15605 D.C. No. CV-92-00596-RCC District of Arizona, Tucson ORDER  On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed August 13, 2009 Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Marsha S. Berzon and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges. FLORES v. HORNE 10921 ORDER We remand this case to the District Court to comply with the Supreme Court s decision in Horne v. Flores, 129 S. Ct. 2579, 2607 (2009). IT IS SO ORDERED. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
