SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA V. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, No. 06-56660 (9th Cir. 2014)

 Annotate this Case

The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on April 16, 2014.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on February 18, 2015.

Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 07 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a California nonprofit religious corporation and EMIL BECA, one of its individual members, No. 06-56660 D.C. No. CV-03-00293-CBM ORDER & MEMORANDUM* Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a California municipal corporation and STEPHEN YEE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued December 4, 2007; Submitted April 7, 2014 Pasadena, California Before: PREGERSON, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. On June 11, 2008, we withheld submission of this case pending final resolution of proceedings in International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, No. 01-56579. On July 7, 2010, we issued an order in International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, No. 01-56579, reversing the district court s summary judgment order in favor of Plaintiff and remanding the case to the district court to consider in the first instance Plaintiff s remaining federal constitutional claim. Because International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, No. 01-56579, has been resolved, this case is resubmitted, and the judgment entered in International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, No. 01-56579, applies to this appeal. The mandate should issue forthwith. REVERSED AND REMANDED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.