Greene v. Camreta, et al, No. 06-35333 (9th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on December 10, 2009.

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SARAH GREENE, personally and as next friend for S.G., a minor, and K.G., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOB CAMRETA; DESCHUTES COUNTY; JAMES ALFORD, Deschutes County Sheriff; BEND LAPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT; TERRY FRIESEN, Defendants-Appellees. ï£¼ ï£½ No. 06-35333 D.C. No. CV-05-06047-AA District of Oregon, Eugene ORDER ï£¾ On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed October 31, 2011 Before: Marsha S. Berzon and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge.* ORDER In Greene v. Camreta, 588 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 2009), we affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court s grant of summary judgment to defendants Alford and Camreta. In relevant part, we held that Alford and Camreta violated the Fourth Amendment through their warrantless in-school seizure and interrogation of [S.G.,] a suspected child abuse victim, given the direct involvement of law enforcement in the child abuse investigation. Id. at 1030. *The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Central California, sitting by designation. 19657 19658 GREENE v. CAMRETA Subsequently, both defendants petitioned for certiorari, seeking review of our Fourth Amendment holding. See Camreta v. Greene, 131 S.Ct. 2020 (2011). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated as moot the portion of our opinion addressing the Fourth Amendment issue. See id. at 2026. Consistent with the Supreme Court s instructions, we VACATE Section II.A. of our opinion and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the remainder of the opinion. We DENY Appellant Greene s motion to file a supplemental brief.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.