Hepting, et al v. AT&T Corporation, et al, No. 06-17132 (9th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS; ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and WIRED NEWS; CONDENET INC., Intervenors, v. AT&T CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and AT&T, INC., Defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenor. 11353 ï£¼ ï£½ ï£¾ No. 06-17132 D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW 11354 HEPTING v. AT&T CORPORATION TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS, ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AT&T CORPORATION; AT&T, INC., Defendants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. ï£¼ ï£½ No. 06-17137 D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW Northern District of California, San Francisco ORDER ï£¾ Filed August 21, 2008 Before: Harry Pregerson, Michael Daly Hawkins, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges. ORDER In light of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-261, we remand this case to the district court. We retain jurisdiction over any further appeals. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.