Navajo Nation, et al v. USFS, et al, No. 06-15371 (9th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NAVAJO NATION; HAVASUPAI TRIBE; REX TILOUSI; DIANNA UQUALLA; SIERRA CLUB; WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE NATION; YAVAPAI-APACHE NATION; THE FLAGSTAFF ACTIVIST NETWORK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and HUALAPAI TRIBE; NORRIS NEZ; BILL BUCKY PRESTON; HOPI TRIBE; CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; NORA RASURE, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Responsible Officer, Coconino National Forest; HARV FORSGREN, appeal deciding office, Regional Forester, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees, ARIZONA SNOWBOWL RESORT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee. 14133 ï£¼ ï£½ ï£¾ No. 06-15371 D.C. Nos. CV-05-01824-PGR CV-05-01914-PGR CV-05-01949-PGR CV-05-01966-PGR 14134 NAVAJO NATION v. USFS NAVAJO NATION; HUALAPAI TRIBE; NORRIS NEZ; BILL BUCKY PRESTON; HAVASUPAI TRIBE; REX TILOUSI; DIANNA UQUALLA; SIERRA CLUB; WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE NATION; YAVAPAI-APACHE NATION; CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; THE FLAGSTAFF ACTIVIST NETWORK, Plaintiffs, and HOPI TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; NORA RASURE, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Responsible Officer, Coconino National Forest; HARV FORSGREN, appeal deciding office, Regional Forester, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees, ARIZONA SNOWBOWL RESORT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee. ï£¼ ï£½ ï£¾ No. 06-15436 D.C. Nos. CV-05-01824-PGR CV-05-01914-PGR CV-05-01949-PGR CV-05-01966-PGR NAVAJO NATION v. USFS HUALAPAI TRIBE; NORRIS NEZ; BILL BUCKY PRESTON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; NORA RASURE, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Responsible Officer, Coconino National Forest; HARV FORSGREN, appeal deciding office, Regional Forester, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. 14135 ï£¼ ï£½ No. 06-15455 D.C. No. CV-05-01824-PGR ORDER ï£¾ Filed October 17, 2007 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge. ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The threejudge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court. 1 Judges Hawkins and Bybee are recused. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.