United States v. Jessie Ivory, No. 24-1209 (8th Cir. 2024)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Erickson, and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking defendant's supervised release or in imposing a within-Guidelines-range revocation sentence. [ April 26, 2024 ]
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1209 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Jessie Ivory, also known as Jesse Holliday lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: April 24, 2024 Filed: April 29, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Jessie Ivory appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to a term of imprisonment within the advisory Sentencing Guidelines 1 The Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. range. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. We conclude that the sentence was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Valure, 835 F.3d 789, 790 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review). There is no indication that the district court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (considerations for reasonableness of sentence); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (sentence within Guidelines range presumptively reasonable). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
