Theresa Marshall v. Educational Credit Mgmt Group, No. 22-2470 (8th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Shepherd, Grasz, and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil case. District court orders dismissing plaintiff's complaints affirmed without comment. [ January 23, 2023 ]
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2460 ___________________________ Theresa Marshall lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Educational Credit Management Group; Educational Credit Management Corporation, ECMC; Kimberly Wood Tucker, Attorney lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ___________________________ No. 22-2470 ___________________________ Theresa Marshall lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Wells Fargo & Company; Wells Fargo Bank NA; Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Vendee Mortgage Trust 1993-1, United States Department of Veterans Administration's Guaranteed Pass-Through Certificate lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeals from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________ Submitted: January 19, 2023 Filed: January 24, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In these back-to-back appeals, Arkansas resident Theresa Marshall appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se complaints. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing the cases. See Laclede Gas Co. v. St. Charles Cnty., Mo., 713 F.3d 413, 417 (8th Cir. 2013) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction); Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) dismissal for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm in both appeals, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Marshall’s pending motions as moot. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
