AALFS Family Partnership v. GSL Holdings, SA de CV, No. 22-1978 (8th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Stras, and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Arbitration. Arbitration award, including the award of attorneys' fees and costs, affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1978 ___________________________ AALFS Family Partnership; Rodawig Family Ltd Partnership; William Eric Rodawig Trust; Jon Andrew Rodawig Trust; James Alex Rodawig Trust; William E Rodawig Family Trust lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellees v. GSL Holdings, SA de CV; CMT De la Laguna, SA de CV; Capacidade de Mexico, SA de CV; Inmobiliaria y Bienes Raices de la Laguna, SA de CV; Ropa Siete Leguas Jeans, SA de CV; Industrial Textil de Puebla, SA de CV; Tavemex, SA de CV; Tavex Inmobiliaria, SA de CV; Tavex USA, Inc; Ropa Siete Leguas, Inc lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellants ___________________________ No. 22-2568 ___________________________ AALFS Family Partnership; Rodawig Family Ltd Partnership; William Eric Rodawig Trust; Jon Andrew Rodawig Trust; James Alex Rodawig Trust; William E Rodawig Family Trust lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellees v. GSL Holdings, SA de CV; CMT De la Laguna, SA de CV; Capacidade de Mexico, SA de CV; Inmobiliaria y Bienes Raices de la Laguna, SA de CV; Ropa Siete Leguas Jeans, SA de CV; Industrial Textil de Puebla, SA de CV; Tavemex, SA de CV; Tavex Inmobiliaria, SA de CV; Tavex USA, Inc; Ropa Siete Leguas, Inc lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellants ____________ Appeals from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Western ____________ Submitted: March 2, 2023 Filed: March 7, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. GSL Holdings and several affiliated entities appeal the confirmation of an arbitration award against them, which included attorney fees and costs. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude there was no “evident partiality” by the arbitrator or “misconduct . . . in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy.” 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(2)–(3); see Brown v. Brown-Thill, 762 F.3d 814, 820 (8th Cir. 2014) (stating that a party seeking to vacate an arbitration award must show “objective facts inconsistent with impartiality” or a “depriv[ation] of a fair hearing” (citation omitted)). Nor did the district court1 make a mistake in setting the attorney-fee award or concluding that GSL’s affiliates were jointly liable for it. See Gen. Mills Operations, LLC v. Five Star Custom Foods, Ltd., 703 F.3d 1104, 1112 (8th Cir. 2013) (reviewing legal issues related to the fee award de novo). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
