United States v. Christopher Pfaff, No. 22-1746 (8th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Colloton, and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Anders case. Defendant's revocation sentence was not unreasonable, as it was within the statutory maximum and the record shows the district court considered the 3553(a) factors in setting the sentence; defendant could not use this revocation proceeding to challenge his original conviction. [ July 22, 2022 ]
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
