Adam Ruessler v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust, No. 21-3876 (8th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this Case
The Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust Board of Trustees (“Board”) denied Plaintiff’s application for disability pension benefits under a plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). Plaintiff argued the Board’s stated reason for denying his application was unreasonable and the Board violated its fiduciary duties. The district court granted the Board’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appealed.
The Eighth Circuit affirmed. The court concluded that the Board did not breach its fiduciary duty when it did not notify Plaintiff the Notice of Decision he submitted on appeal was insufficient. The initial letter the Board sent to Plaintiff noting the absence of the document clearly stated Plaintiff needed to submit a “Notice of Award.” When the plain language of the Plan and the Board’s other communications are consistent, there is no obvious unfairness to Plaintiff if his claim is denied because he submitted the wrong document. Further, the court found that there is no evidence the Board knew silence would harm Plaintiff because, in the May 2018 phone call, Plaintiff himself asked about how waiting to receive the pension would affect the annuity amount and ultimately requested estimates for retirement at later ages. Moreover, Plaintiff has not identified anything that should have caused the Board to know he misunderstood his rights. Under these circumstances, Plaintiff failed to establish a violation of the duty of loyalty.
Court Description: [Grasz, Author, with Shepherd and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - ERISA. The appropriate standard of review for the defendant Board's decision is for an abuse of discretion, taking into consideration a conflict of interest as a factor in the analysis; even if the court assumes a conflict of interest exists and gives it appropriate weight in evaluating the defendant's decision, it does not change the outcome of the case; the defendant's interpretation of the provision of the plan that an application would be denied if the applicant did not obtain a notice of award from the Social Security Administration within 180 days of the application for Plan benefits was reasonable; claim of breach of fiduciary duty of loyalty rejected. Judge Kelly, concurring.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.