United States v. Andrew Ryan, No. 21-3541 (8th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this Case
Defendant appealed the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the Government’s petition for civil commitment under 18 U.S.C. Section 4246. Defendant argued that the Middle District of Tennessee violated the time restrictions in Section 4241(d), depriving the Western District of Missouri of subject matter jurisdiction to civilly commit him under Section 4246 because the timing violation he was no longer lawfully “committed to the custody of the Attorney General pursuant to section 4241(d).”
The Eighth Circuit affirmed. The court explained that Defendant did not object to the alleged Section 4241(d) timing violations in the Middle District of Tennessee. Although did he complain to the Middle District of Tennessee in status updates about the delays on the grounds that they violated his rights to a speedy trial and due process. But he never formally requested release, filed an appeal in the Sixth Circuit, or requested a writ of mandamus from the Sixth Circuit. Thus, Defendant waived his right to challenge the alleged Section 4241(d) timing violations. Because the alleged Section 4241(d) timing violations are the basis of Defendant’s Section 4246 challenge, his Section 4246 challenge fails.
Court Description: [Gruender, Author, with Melloy and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Civil Commitment - 18 U.S.C. Sec. 4246. The requirement in Sec. 4246(a) that a defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 4241(d) is not jurisdictional and can be waived; by failing to raise the challenge in the correct court - the district that ordered the Sec. 4241 custody, rather than the district where he is confined - defendant waived his right to challenge the alleged Sec. 4241(d) timing violations; because the timing violations are the basis for the Sec. 4246 challenge, that challenge fails. [ October 27, 2022 ]
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.