Neal Maddox v. HUD, No. 21-2461 (8th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Erickson, Grasz, and Stras, Circuit Judges] Civil case. Pre-service dismissal affirmed without comment. [ October 06, 2021 ]
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-2461 ___________________________ Neal K. Maddox, "Scott K." lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________ Submitted: October 4, 2021 Filed: October 7, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________ Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In this employment action, Neal Maddox appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of his pro se complaint. After careful review of the record and 1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Maddox’s arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Doe v. Cassel, 403 F.3d 986, 990 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
