Ira Harris v. Ian Wallace, No. 21-1546 (8th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Benton, and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. The district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment is affirmed; plaintiff failed to show defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. [ September 27, 2021 ]
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1546 ___________________________ Ira B. Harris lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Gary Kempker lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant Ian Wallace, Warden, SECC lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee Corizon Medical Services, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant George Lombardi, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections; Troy Steele, Warden, Potosi Correctional Center lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees Dr. Unknown Nakra; Linda Little, Nurse, Potosi Correctional Center; Dr. Unknown McKinley, Doctor at Potosi Correctional Center; Dr. Unknown Gavin, Psychiatrist, Southeast Correctional Center; Brandi Puden, Health Services Administrator; Norma Helbring, Nursing Director, SECC; Robin Allen, Nursing Director, SECC; Heather Reese, Chief Psychologist, SECC; Suzy Unknown, CNA, SECC; Heather Conrad, Nurse, SECC; Lisa Unknown, Nurse, SECC; Dr. Unknown Hill, Doctor, SECC; Ryan Unknown; Megan Unknown, Nurse, SECC lllllllllllllllllll llDefendants David Null lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee Unknown Thurston, Corrections Officer, SECC; Missouri Department of Corrections; Missouri Department of Mental Health lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants Anne L. Precythe lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee Keith Schafer lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant Corizon, LLC; Brandi Juden; Cynthia Reese; M.D. John Eppolito; Nina Hill; William McKinney; Mark Stringer lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau ____________ Submitted: September 24, 2021 Filed: September 29, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. -2- Ira Harris appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Roberts v. Kopel, 917 F.3d 1039, 1041 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review), we affirm. We agree that appellees Reese and Corizon were not deliberately indifferent with respect to Harris’s psychiatric treatment, see Shipp v. Murphy, 9 F.4th 694, 704 (8th Cir. 2021) (nurse had no duty to go beyond her scope of practice to prescribe item, and thus no reasonable jury could find that her care was deliberately indifferent); Hildreth v. Butler, 960 F.3d 420, 430 (7th Cir. 2020) (health care entity not liable for isolated instances of delayed prescription refills); and that appellees McKinney, Eppolito, and Hill provided treatment for his abscess that was no more than negligent, see Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 107 (1976) (decision not to order X-ray or similar measures is malpractice at most); Allard v. Baldwin, 779 F.3d 768, 772 (8th Cir. 2015) (inmate’s expert testimony that physician should have accurately diagnosed condition showed only negligent malpractice); Hartsfield v. Colburn, 491 F.3d 394, 398 (8th Cir. 2007) (whether physician should have acted sooner in scheduling follow-up visit was at most question of negligence). We also find that appellees Reese, Juden, Wallace, and Steele were not deliberately indifferent by failing to intervene in Harris’s treatment, as that treatment was not constitutionally infirm. See Morris v. Cradduck, 954 F.3d 1055, 1060 (8th Cir. 2020) (where inmate did not establish that nurse was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, sheriff did not violate inmate’s rights by ignoring his complaints about nurse). As Harris does not argue his claims against appellees Null, Precythe, Lombardi, or Stringer on appeal, those claims are waived. See Waters v. Madson, 921 F.3d 725, 744 (8th Cir. 2019). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Harris’s pending motions. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
