United States v. Eric Rhine, No. 21-1106 (8th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Erickson, Grasz, and Stras, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Anders case. The district court did not err in determining that a safety-valve reduction was not available where defendant failed to provide complete and truthful information to investigators.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1106 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Eric Allen Rhine lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern ____________ Submitted: September 29, 2021 Filed: October 6, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________ Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Eric Rhine pleaded guilty to conspiring to manufacture, distribute, and possess with intent to distribute heroin. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 846. In an Anders brief, Rhine’s counsel suggests that the district court 1 should have imposed a sentence below the mandatory minimum of 120 months under the socalled safety valve in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in determining that the safety-valve reduction was unavailable on these facts. See United States v. Soto, 448 F.3d 993, 995–96 (8th Cir. 2006) (reviewing the district court’s findings on the availability of a safety-valve reduction for clear error). As the court found, Rhine failed to provide complete and truthful information to investigators. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5); see also United States v. SanchezGonzalez, 643 F.3d 626, 630 (8th Cir. 2011) (stating that a district court may assess truthfulness by considering how a defendant’s statements have changed). We have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83 (1988). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel permission to withdraw. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
