Donald East v. Warden Robert Dooley, No. 20-3144 (8th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Benton, and Stras, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. Orders granting one defendant's motion to dismiss and the other defendants' motion for summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-3113 ___________________________ Donald East, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. Warden Robert Dooley; Warden Brent Fluke, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants, PA Bradley Adams, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee, PA Karissa Zimmer; RN Dayna Klawitter; LPN Brittany Huber; CPL Ahrens; CPL Barta; CO Mastalir; Jane Does, 1 and 2 and 3; Other Unknown Persons, and Entities in their individual and official capacities; LPN Janelle Bastemeyer, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants. ___________________________ No. 20-3144 ___________________________ Donald East, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. Warden Robert Dooley; Warden Brent Fluke, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees, PA Bradley Adams, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant, PA Karissa Zimmer; RN Dayna Klawitter; LPN Brittany Huber; CPL Ahrens; CPL Barta; CO Mastalir; Jane Does, 1 and 2 and 3; Other Unknown Persons, and Entities in their individual and official capacities; LPN Janelle Bastemeyer, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees. ____________ Appeals from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern ____________ Submitted: April 28, 2021 Filed: May 10, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals following final judgment in an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Donald East, an inmate at Mike Durfee State Prison, appeals the judgment of the district court.1 The court granted one defendant’s motion to dismiss, 1 The Honorable Roberto A. Lange, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. -2- and granted summary judgment for the remaining defendants. Upon careful de novo review, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
