Gordon Miles v. Emily Piper-Johnson, No. 20-1965 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Shepherd, Kelly and Stras, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. The district court's order dismissing this Section 1983 action brought by a person civilly committed to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program is affirmed without comment. [ December 11, 2020 ]
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1965 ___________________________ Gordon Miles lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Emily Johnson Piper; Nancy Johnston; Kevin Moser; Peter Puffer; Beth Soderman; Katherine Lockie; Courtney Jo Menten; Joseph Mullen; Heidi Menard; Skye Brister; Katherine McDowell; Staci Bovin; Sarah Herrick; Skye Renee Davis; Jennifer Johnson; Ruby Brewer; Kent Johansen; Paul Mayfield; Debbie Becker-Sailor; Brian Ninneman; Susan Johnson; Jenny Collelo; Nathan John Madsen; Matthew Brown; Adam Young; Joseph Marczak; Donald Geil; Brittany Jorgenson; Katy Porter; Elizabeth Peterson; Meg McCauley; Jensina Rosen; Leann Bergman; John and Jane Doe, all in their personal and official capacities; Tony Lourey, in his personal capacity; Jodi Harpstead, in her official capacity as the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: December 9, 2020 Filed: December 14, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Gordon Miles, who is civilly committed to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program, appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Following a careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing the case. See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review of dismissal for failure to state a claim). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Katherine M. Menendez, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
