Micheel v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., No. 20-1800 (8th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
After plaintiff was injured in a car accident, she sought underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits from American Family. American Family paid only half of its $100,000 policy limit because of an offset provision in the policy. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that the offset provision did not apply.
The Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, concluding that the terms of the original policy—which included the offset provision—govern here. The court explained that, under Missouri law, by continuing to pay her insurance premiums, plaintiff obtained new policy periods, but the terms of her initial policy—including the offset provision—remained the same. The court rejected plaintiff's claim that American Family created ambiguity in the insurance policy by issuing the summary. Accordingly, American Family is entitled to summary judgment.
Court Description: [Kobes, Author, with Shepherd and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Insurance. The auto insurance policy in question was not ambiguous and an offset provision contained in the original policy applied; under Missouri law, plaintiff, by continuing to pay her premiums, obtained new policy periods, but the terms of the original policy, including the offset provision, remained the same; summary pages sent at time of renewal did not create an ambiguity; reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.