United States v. Callison, No. 20-1398 (8th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's grant of defendant's motion to suppress drug-related evidence that police uncovered during a traffic stop. The court agreed with the government that the officer who pulled over defendant and others in the vehicle did not extend the traffic stop until he asked the driver of the vehicle if there was anything illegal in the car roughly six minutes into the encounter. In this case, when the officer asked his initial series of travel-related questions between five and six minutes into the encounter, he was still handling the matter for which the stop was made -- issuing a ticket for the unlit license plate violation. Therefore, the court concluded that the district court erred in holding that the officer needed reasonable suspicion of another crime to extend the stop when he began asking travel-related questions five minutes into the encounter. The court also agreed with the government that by the time the officer asked if there was anything illegal in the car, he had the reasonable suspicion required to extend the stop.
Court Description: [Grasz, Author, with Loken and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. The government appeals the district court's order granting defendant's motion to suppress evidence from a traffic stop; the district court erred in holding the office needed reasonable suspicion of another crime to extend the stop when he began asking travel-related questions five minutes into the encounter; because the officer was still handling the matter for which the stop was made at that point, his questions did not extend the stop; when the officer asked if there was anything illegal in the car at the six-minutes mark in the encounter, he had the reasonable suspicion required to extend the stop; reversed and remanded.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.