Richards v. Rabo ArgiFinance, LLC, No. 19-6039 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court's determination that the interested parties were equitably estopped from asserting ownership of machinery and equipment in debtor's bankruptcy case. In this case, the interested parties allowed the misrepresentations concerning debtor's assets to continue throughout the bankruptcy case and now seek to protect their alleged pecuniary interests. The court found that the interested parties' arguments lacked merit and were not properly before the district court. The court also affirmed the bankruptcy court's denial of the interested parties' request for the bankruptcy court to alter or amend its ruling or for a new trial.
Court Description: [Schermer, Author, with Shodeen and Sanberg, Bankruptcy Judges] Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. The bankruptcy court did not err in determining the Richards were equitably estopped from claiming ownership in certain machinery and equipment. [ May 01, 2020 ]
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.