Raynor v. Walker, No. 19-6010 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseThe Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the bankruptcy court's orders dismissing debtor's adversary proceeding and denying his post-dismissal motion. The panel held that the bankruptcy court properly dismissed debtor's adversary proceeding as a collateral attack on prior rulings. In this case, the post-dismissal motion repeated the same arguments already made by debtor.
Court Description: Schermer, Author, with Dow and Sanberg, Bankruptcy Judges] Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Debtor's adversary proceeding was a impermissible collateral attack on a 2008 order regarding the dischargeability of a loan obligation, and the bankruptcy court did not err in dismissing it; no error in denying debtor's post-dismissal motion as it simply repeated the arguments already rejected. [ July 24, 2019
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.