Wood v. Wooten, No. 19-3507 (8th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant in a 42 U.S.C. 1983 action brought by plaintiff, alleging a claim for unreasonable seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The court concluded that defendant had probable cause to arrest plaintiff where he had an outstanding arrest warrant at the time of arrest, and the warrant was valid. Furthermore, plaintiff was driving with a broken headlight in violation of Missouri law. The court explained that, although defendant told plaintiff he was under arrest for a DWI, defendant had probable cause based on the outstanding warrant or the broken headlight. Furthermore, an officer's wrongly-stated reason for an arrest does not nullify an otherwise lawful arrest, and a claim that defendant fabricated evidence about the arrest does not negate his probable cause at the time of the arrest.
Court Description: [Benton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Kobes, Circuit Judge] Civil case - Civil rights. Defendant had probable cause to arrest plaintiff; an officer's misstatement of the reasons for the arrest does not nullify an otherwise lawful arrest; claim that defendant fabricated evidence about the arrest after the fact does not change the fact that defendant had probable cause at the time of arrest.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.