Ruth Richter v. Sprint/VMUSA, No. 19-2929 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Shepherd, Kelly and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Civil case. Dismissal affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2929 ___________________________ Ruth Richter lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Sprint/VMUSA lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________ Appeals from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: November 21, 2019 Filed: November 26, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Ruth Richter appeals after the district court1 dismissed her pro se complaint. Upon careful review of the record and Richter’s arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
