United States v. Loggins, No. 19-2689 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this Case
The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018. Defendant was originally sentenced to 353 months' imprisonment for three counts of Hobbs Act robbery and two counts of using a firearm during and in relation to those robberies.
The court held that defendant failed to establish extraordinary or compelling reasons to warrant compassionate release. The court need not decide whether the statute supersedes the policy statement in determining whether a movant qualifies for compassionate release, because the district court's order shows that it considered the circumstances urged by defendant and found them insufficient. The court held that the district court has broad discretion in determining whether proffered circumstances warrant a reduction in sentence and the district court's conclusion was a reasonable exercise of that discretion.
Court Description: [Colloton, Author, with Gruender and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in denying Loggins's motion for compassionate release; whether or not the district court is constrained by the Sentencing Commission's relevant policy statement, Guidelines Sec. 1B1.13, comment. (n.4), in determining whether a movant qualifies for compassionate release, the record shows the district court considered the other circumstances urged by Loggins and found them insufficient to grant relief; the district court has broad discretion in determining whether the proffered circumstances warrant a sentence reduction and the court's denial of Loggins's request was a reasonable exercise of that discretion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.