United States v. Christopher Fisher, No. 19-2547 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Benton, Shepherd and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Anders case. The additional term of supervised release imposed upon the revocation of defendant's current term of supervised release did not exceed the statutory maximum; the additional term of supervised release was not substantively unreasonable. [ February 26, 2020 ]
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2547 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Christopher Michael Fisher lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________ Submitted: February 24, 2020 Filed: February 27, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In 2013, Christopher Fisher was convicted of violating of 18 U.S.C. § 2250. He now appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release for the third 1 The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. time, and sentenced him to a prison term within the Chapter 7 advisory Guidelines range and an additional 24-month term of supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief arguing that the additional term of supervised release exceeds the statutory maximum and is unreasonable. We conclude that the additional term of supervised release does not exceed the statutory maximum, which is life. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h) (when court revokes supervised release and sentences defendant to prison term followed by additional term of supervised release, length of such term of supervised release shall not exceed statutorily authorized term of supervised release for offense of conviction, less any revocation prison terms), (k) (maximum term of supervised release for § 2250 violation is life). We also conclude that the additional term of supervised release is not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (revocation sentence is reviewed under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard). We therefore affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
