John Nimmer v. Hon. Michael Heavican, No. 19-2426 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Beam and Loken, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Dismissal of Section 1983 action affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2426 ___________________________ John C. Nimmer lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Hon. Michael G. Heavican, Chief Justice of the Nebraska Supreme Court in his official capacity; Hon. Stephanie F. Stacy, Justice of the Nebraska Supreme Court in her official capacity; Hon. Lindsey Miller-Lerman, Justice of the Nebraska Supreme Court in her official capacity; Hon. William Cassel, Justice of the Nebraska Supreme Court in his official capacity; Jonathan J. Papik, Justice of the Nebraska Supreme Court in his official capacity; Hon. Jeffrey J. Funk, Justice of the Nebraska Supreme Court in his official capacity; Hon. John R. Freudenberg, Justice of the Nebraska Supreme Court in his official capacity; Mark Alan Weber, Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court, in his official capacity lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln ____________ Submitted: April 23, 2020 Filed: May 1, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. John Nimmer appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 asserting claims related to Nebraska attorney disciplinary proceedings. Upon careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Newcombe v. United States, 933 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
