Vincent Argentino v. Ruanne Stamps, No. 19-2348 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Beam and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. Order granting defendants summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2348 ___________________________ Vincent A. Argentino lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Corizon Medical Services lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant Ruanne Stamps, Dr.; Narendrasinh Khengar, Dr.; Rex Hardman, Dr. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees Reuben Thacker, Dr. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant Glen Babbich, Dr. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee Dr. Thomas Kevin Bredeman, Regional Medical Director lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant Amanda Verdot, Nurse; Samantha Lucas, Nurse; Hanna Wingate, Nurse; Matthew W. Pittman, Nurse lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees Cheryl Clad, Nurse; Patricia King, Nurse; Cheryl Galberth, Nurse lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants Pamela Swartz, Nurse Practitioner lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee Ashok Kumar Chada, Dr. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City ____________ Submitted: March 24, 2020 Filed: March 27, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Missouri inmate Vincent A. Argentino appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Construing the record in a light most favorable to Argentino, and drawing all inferences in his favor, we find that the grant of summary judgment to defendants was proper, see Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review); and we find no error in the 1 The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2- district court orders denying Argentino’s various motions. The judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B; and appellant’s motions for oral argument, and the parties’ motions for supplemental briefing, are denied. ______________________________ -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
