John L. Corrigan, Jr. v. City of Savage, No. 19-1920 (8th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1920 ___________________________ John L. Corrigan, Jr., lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. City of Savage, a municipal entity; Kyle Klapperick, Police Officer; Alexandria Marklowitz, Police Officer; Amber Bernier, a private individual; Nelson Rhodus, Assistant Scott County Attorney; Christian Wilton, Judge; Lynn Hanson, Probation Officer; Gabe Kerkaert, Police Officer; Edward Culbreth, Officer; Ashley Uthe, Police Officer; Luke Hennen, Scott County Sheriff; Scott County, a municipality, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: November 25, 2019 Filed: December 2, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. John Corrigan appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se action asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Savage and several of its police officers, Scott County and several of its employees, the trial court judge who presided over his criminal trial, and the victim of the underlying criminal charge. After careful de novo review, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing the case. See Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review of grant of Rule 12(b)(6) motion); Saterdalen v. Spencer, 725 F.3d 838, 840-41 (8th Cir. 2013) (de novo review of district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.