United States v. Magallon, No. 19-1820 (8th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
A grand jury indicted Defendants Magallon and Garcia Ortiz with conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing methamphetamine and at least 50 grams of actual methamphetamine. Garcia Ortiz was also indicted with possession with intent to distribute at least 500 grams of a mixture and substance containing methamphetamine. Garcia Ortiz conditionally pleaded guilty to the conspiracy charge, and Magallon was convicted by a jury of the conspiracy charge.
The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Garcia Ortiz's motion to suppress evidence where officers had an objectively reasonable suspicion that the GMC Sierra's occupants were involved in criminal activity, namely drug distribution; reasonable suspicion clearly existed to justify the stop and remained present as further information unfolded during the stop; and the officers did not exceed the mission of the stop. Furthermore, the district court did not err in finding that Garcia Ortiz consented to the search of the Lexus. The court also affirmed the district court's denial of Garcia Ortiz's motion to suppress his post-Miranda statements. In this case, defendant voluntarily waived his rights against self-incrimination and to counsel. Finally, the court held that the district court did not err in denying Magallon's request for a willful blindness instruction, and the evidence was sufficient to support defendant his conspiracy conviction.
Court Description: [Smith, Author, with Benton and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court did not err in denying defendant Garcia Ortiz's motion to suppress a search as the officers had reasonable, articulable suspicion, based on their on-going investigation and observations that the occupants of the stopped vehicle were involved in criminal activity, namely drug distribution; reasonable suspicion clearly existed to justify the stop and remain present as further information unfolded during the stop, and the district court did not err in finding officers did not exceed the mission of the stop; the district court did not err in concluding on this record that Garcia Ortiz voluntarily consented to the search of the automobile; Garcia Ortiz's post-Miranda statements were admissible as he voluntarily waived his rights against self-incrimination and to counsel; the district court did not err in denying defendant Magallon's request for a willful blindness instruction; evidence was sufficient to support defendant Magollon's conviction for conspiracy to distribute drugs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.