Dawda Jeng v. William P. Barr, No. 19-1690 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Erickson and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. The BIA's dismissal of petitioner's appeal of the IJ's decision finding him removable for committing two crimes involving moral turpitude and the BIA's denial of a motion to reopen the proceedings are affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3645 ___________________________ Dawda Jeng lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ___________________________ No. 19-1690 ___________________________ Dawda Jeng lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: February 6, 2020 Filed: February 10, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In these consolidated matters, Dawda Jeng petitions for review of orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Specifically, he challenges the BIA’s dismissal of his appeal from the decision of an immigration judge, finding him removable for having committed two crimes involving moral turpitude, and denying him withholding of removal. He also challenges the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen his appeal. Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C) and (D) to review constitutional claims or questions of law, and after careful consideration of the petitions, this court finds no basis for reversal. Accordingly, the petitions for review are denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
