United States v. Trevor Ray, No. 19-1377 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Stras, Wollman and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. Order denying defendant's motion for new trial affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1377 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Trevor Scott Ray lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City ____________ Submitted: December 23, 2019 Filed: December 30, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before STRAS, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Trevor Ray appeals the district court1 order denying his motion for a new trial and denying his requests for copies of documents. Our review of the record satisfies 1 The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. us that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a new trial. See United States v. Grover, 511 F.3d 779, 783 (8th Cir. 2007) (denial of motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence is reviewed for abuse of discretion). We also find no basis for reversal of the district court’s ruling on Ray’s requests for documents. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
