Onesmus Daniel v. William P. Barr, No. 19-1236 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam. Before Gruender, Benton, and Stras, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. Petition for review is summarily denied.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1236 ___________________________ Onesmus Bogonko Daniel lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: November 4, 2019 Filed: November 5, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Kenyan citizen Onesmus Daniel petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decisions of an immigration judge, which granted the Department of Homeland Security’s motion to reconsider a decision to terminate removal proceedings, and denied him cancellation of removal.1 Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and after careful consideration of the petition, this court finds no basis for reversal. The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The agency’s remaining findings — including the denial of asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture, and voluntary departure—are not before this panel. See Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004) (claim not raised in opening brief is waived). -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
