Daniel Hurlbut v. Sheriff Tim Helder, No. 19-1193 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Benton, Kelly and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Defendants' summary judgment affirmed without comment. [ September 10, 2019
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1193 ___________________________ Daniel Bryce Hurlbut lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Washington County Detention Center lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant Sheriff Tim Helder; Karas Medical Team; Dr. Karas; Veronica Dockery; Ken Hughes; Landon Harris; Regina Walker; Lieutenant Foster lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees John Doe Deputies lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant Deputy Josve Velasco; Deputy Skinkis; Deputy Uriel Paredes lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville ____________ Submitted: September 6, 2019 Filed: September 11, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BENTON, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, former inmate Daniel Bryce Hurlbut appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Viewing the record and all reasonable inferences in Hurlbut’s favor, see Allard v. Baldwin, 779 F.3d 768, 771 (8th Cir. 2015) (de novo review), we find no error in the district court’s thorough analysis of Hurlbut’s claims.2 The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 2 We lack jurisdiction to consider Hurlbut’s challenges to a magistrate judge’s adverse rulings on nondispositive pretrial matters, because he did not timely object to those orders below. See Daley v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., 415 F.3d 889, 893 n.9 (8th Cir. 2005) (when parties do not consent to final disposition by magistrate, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider direct appeal of magistrate’s order on nondispositive pretrial matter). -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
