Spencer Pierce v. Jerry Lovejoy, No. 19-1087 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Shepherd, and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Dismissal affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1087 ___________________________ Spencer Pierce lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Jerry Lovejoy; Mike Roth; Rex Sparks; Securus Technology; John P. Sarcone; Matthew Towers; Trudy Simonson; Brad Youngblut; Gerald Fisher; Mark Paulson; John Doe; Lorna Garcia; James Entrekin; Michael McTaggart; Brady Carney lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________ Submitted: November 6, 2019 Filed: November 13, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Spencer Pierce appeals three district court1 orders disposing of his pro se 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action. Following a careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing the case. See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is reviewed de novo); Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
