Myra Goswell-Renner v. William P. Barr, No. 18-3758 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam. Before Loken, Shepherd, and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to reconsider, reopen and terminate removal proceedings as untimely and numerically barred. [ January 08, 2020
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3758 ___________________________ Myra Modupe Goswell-Renner lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: January 6, 2020 Filed: January 10, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Myra Modupe Goswell-Renner, a citizen of The Gambia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her motion to reconsider, reopen, and terminate her removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Goswell-Renner’s motion as untimely and numerically barred. See Mshihiri v. Holder, 753 F.3d 785, 789 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review). Moreover, Goswell-Renner’s challenge to the agency’s jurisdiction over her removal proceedings is foreclosed by this court’s precedent. See Ali v. Barr, 924 F.3d 983, 986 (8th Cir. 2019). Accordingly, the petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
