Lasu v. Barr, No. 18-3550 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this Case
The Eighth Circuit denied petitions for review of the BIA's final order of removal denying petitioner's application for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). As a preliminary matter, the court held that it was precluded from reviewing the issue of whether the BIA incorrectly applied the clear error standard of review and engaged in improper factfinding, because petitioner had not exhausted his administrative remedies as to these issues when he filed his initial petition, and because, after exhausting, he never properly petitioned this court to review them.
The court also held that the BIA did not err in finding that petitioner had failed to meet his burden of persuasion that he is more likely than not to be tortured if returned to South Sudan. In this case, the BIA's decision is supported by substantial evidence because the BIA correctly concluded that petitioner must show more than a pattern of general ethnic violence in South Sudan to meet the CAT's likelihood requirement. Therefore, a reasonable adjudicator could have found the evidence insufficient to establish a likelihood of torture.
Court Description: [Gruender, Author, with Kelly and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. Petitioner's arguments that BIA incorrectly applied the clear error standard of review and engaged in improper fact-finding are not before the court as petitioner failed to raise the arguments in his initial appeal from the IJ's decision and failed to petition for review of the denial of his motion for reconsideration; The BIA did not err in denying petitioner's application for relief under the Convention Against Torture based on its determination that petitioner had not established that it was more likely than not that he would be tortured either by or with the consent of South Sudanese officials if he were returned to the country; the decision is supported by substantial evidence because the BIA correctly concluded that petitioner must show more than a pattern of general ethnic violence in South Sudan to meet CAT's likelihood requirement. Judge Kelly, dissenting.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.