Meyer v. McKenzie Electric Cooperative, Inc., No. 18-3244 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this Case
Plaintiff, an employee of 4T Construction, filed suit against McKenzie under both negligence-based and strict liability law principles after he was seriously injured while replacing a high voltage transmission line for a project.
The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment for McKenzie, holding that the parties' contract clearly and unambiguously stated that 4T was retained as an independent contractor. In this case, the parties' contract stated that 4T was an independent contractor that performs its work without supervision by McKenzie. The court held that McKenzie did not retain control over 4T's and plaintiff's actions. Finally, the North Dakota Supreme Court has declined to hold a utility company strictly liable for injuries and damages from contact with high tension power lines, and McKenzie was not liable under a theory of strict liability for abnormally dangerous activities.
Court Description: Wollman, Author, with Colloton and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Torts. Plaintiff's employer was an independent contractor for the project on which plaintiff was injured, and defendant McKenzie did not maintain the kind of control over the employer's work which would make it liable for the employer's acts or omission; neither McKenzie's interest in completion of the project or its periodic inspections created enough supervision to manifest actual control over plaintiff's employer; North Dakota has declined to hold a utility company strictly liable for injuries and damages from contact with high tension power lines and McKenzie was not liable under a theory of strict liability for abnormally dangerous activities.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.