United States v. Jonathan Alexander, No. 18-3240 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Kelly and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Arkansas robbery is a crime of violence under both the force clause and the enumerated offense clause of Guidelines Sec. 4B1.2. See United States v. Stoval, 921 F.3d 758 (8th Cir. 2019).
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3240 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Jonathan Alexander lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________ Submitted: June 10, 2019 Filed: July 30, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Jonathan Alexander pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). At sentencing, the district court1 1 The Honorable D. P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. increased Alexander’s base offense level because his prior conviction for robbery in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-12-102 was “a crime of violence.” See USSG § 2K2.1(a)(3). This resulted in an advisory guidelines range of 78 to 97 months in prison. Alexander appeals his 78-month sentence, arguing his Arkansas robbery conviction is not a crime of violence under the Guidelines. “The term ‘crime of violence’ means any offense under federal or state law, punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, that -- (1) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another, or (2) is . . . robbery.” USSG § 4B1.2(a), incorporated by reference in § 2K2.1, comment. (n.1). Alexander argues that Arkansas robbery is not a crime of violence under § 4B1.2(a) because (1) the degree of physical force required to commit the offense does not rise to the level of force required by the force clause, § 4B1.2(a)(1), and (2) the elements of Arkansas robbery “sweep more broadly” than the elements of the enumerated offense of generic robbery in § 4B1.2(a)(2). In United States v. Stovall, 921 F.3d 758, 760 (8th Cir. 2019), we held that “Arkansas robbery has the same elements as the generic definition of robbery.” In United States v. Smith, No. 17-3760, 2019 WL 2619867 (8th Cir. June 27, 2019), applying Stokeling v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 544 (2019), we held that Arkansas robbery requires sufficient force to overcome a victim’s resistance; therefore it is a crime of violence under both the force clause and the enumerated offense clause of USSG § 4B1.2. 2019 WL 2619867 at *2. We are bound by these recent, controlling decisions. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
